• About us
  • Links that we like

Fight for the Right: the Birmingham Suffragettes

~ the official project blog

Fight for the Right: the Birmingham Suffragettes

Tag Archives: equality

March, Women, March

05 Wednesday Jun 2013

Posted by Fight for the Right in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

asquith, emily wilding davison, equality, fawcett, helen pankhurst, history, lucinda hawksley, lydia becker, militant, nightingale, norton, NUWSS, pankhurst, politics, prison, protest, rokeby venus, suffrage, suffragettes, suffragists, vote, wollstonecraft, women's rights, wspu

On June 4th 100 years ago Emily Wilding Davison stepped out in front of the galloping horses at the Derby and attempted to grab the reigns of the King’s horse, Anmer. She died from her injuries four days later. There has been much press and media interest in the suffragettes over the last couple of weeks, for example, Deeds not Words by Val McDermid on BBC Radio 4, Clare Balding’s Channel 4 programme, Secrets of a Suffragette, Up the Women, a new comedy by Jessica Hynes, and The Independent’s New Suffragettes, to name a few, and there are many more events yet to come, including The Wilding Festival, Kate Willoughby’s To Freedom’s Cause, Dreadnought South West’s production of Oxygen, and our own project, Fight for the Right: the Birmingham Suffragettes. A new book has also been published, March, Women, March, by Lucinda Hawksley with foreword by Dr Helen Pankhurst, grand-daughter of Sylvia (Andre Deutsch, 2013).

March, Women, March by Lucinda Hawksley

Hawksley’s book is a must-read for anyone interested in women’s history and the suffrage campaign, from Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Women, published in 1792, to the so-called ‘flapper election’ of 1929, when, finally, all women over the age of 18 were entitled to vote. It is told through individual stories and through literature, art and fashion as well as political and social history.

Hawksley begins by taking us back to a time when women were treated as juveniles, perceived as incapable of engaging with politics. During the 1820s and 30s, however, the issue of entitlement refused to go away, although it focused primarily at this time on increasing male suffrage. Nevertheless, the debate had been raised and the book explores the many women who refused to let the cause go. The 1843 Report of the Poor Law Commissioners of the Employment of Women and Children in Agriculture supported the notion that women should be sacrificed for the sake of men and for the family as a whole. Caroline Norton’s ill-fated marriage and subsequent endurance of domestic abuse, both physical and mental, is also discussed and it was her fight to change the law to allow women custody of children following divorce that massively advanced the rights of women in the nineteenth century. Norton’s experience is cleverly set against Florence Nightingale’s story, whose desire to be useful and contribute to the world in a meaningful way contrasted dramatically with the society in which she grew up.

Hawksley’s discussion of the legal aspects of marriage enforces how much women had to fight against – the notion persisted of a woman as her husband’s property, adultery by women was not seen in same way as male adultery, earnings had to be handed over to a husband, and women lacked any rights over the custody of their children. In 1867 Lydia Becker wrote: ‘I think that the notion that the husband ought to have the headship or authority over his wife, is the root of all social evils… Husband and wife should be co-equal. In a happy marriage there is no question of “obedience”’ – the tide was slowly beginning to turn.

The Garrett sisters, Elizabeth and Millicent, herald the beginnings of the suffrage campaign that led to the ‘suffragettes’, although the term ‘suffragist’ is now less familiar to the general public. Hawksley explores the legal ramifications of the suffrage campaign, the slow chipping away in order to achieve equality. Both male and female belonged to the suffrage societies of the 1860s and 70s; London, Edinburgh and Manchester were the early strongholds, later joined by Birmingham and Bristol, but 1871 saw the first split within the movement, and this awarded opponents an excuse to ridicule the movement as well as giving rise to lampooning in periodicals of the female members of suffrage societies as ugly and lacking womanly “charms” (this reminds me of similar accusations levelled at today’s feminist movement as divisive and the old-fashioned view of feminists as man-hating and humourless).

The 1884 Reform Bill once again saw political betrayal – the Liberal Prime Minister William Gladstone thought that women who gained the vote, those who were wealthy and land-owning, would naturally lean towards voting Conservative, although the same year did see some positive progress with the new Married Women’s Property Act which declared that women were no longer defined as “chattel”. Millicent Garrett Fawcett, sworn in as head of the National Union of Women’s Suffrage Societies in 1890, had given a speech in 1886 where she remarked that 20 years was a long time to fight for the vote – it would take another 42 years before full suffrage. 1887 saw the first examples of unrest: during a Social Democratic Federation march a riot ensued. The accounts of police behaviour sound uncannily similar to today’s tactic of ‘kettling’ as protestors were blocked in against shop fronts while the police protected the properties of wealthy taxpayers. Indeed, the tragic incident of Alfred Linnell echoes the shocking death of newspaper vendor Ian Tomlinson in 2009; like Tomlinson, Linnell was a bystander, in this case, trampled to death by a police horse.

The initial aim of the Women’s Social & Political Union, formed by Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughters Christabel and Sylvia in Manchester in 1903, was to work alongside the NUWSS, although they felt that bold action was now essential. Initially they targeted Liberal party meetings (in 1909 Prime Minister Asquith was attacked at the budget meeting in Birmingham). However, not all women agreed that they should have the right to vote and anti-suffrage organisations, often headed by women, were set up in response to the suffrage campaign. It is particularly difficult today to understand the position of the anti-suffragists; Hawksley quotes Mrs Arthur Somerville who remarked in a speech that only married women should be considered for the vote, and in her opinion ‘adult suffrage would …enfranchise a large number of ignorant and incompetent people’, while Margot Asquith, second wife of the Prime Minister, pronounced suffragettes ‘wombless, vicious, cruel women’. While the presence of the anti-suffragists did help unite the various suffrage organisations, by 1907 there were serious rifts within the WSPU and some prominent members left to form the Women’s Freedom League.

Hawksley does a fantastic job of acknowledging the contribution of the many different groups and women who came from different social backgrounds – the ‘army of women – and men – who spent all their spare time composing letters, handing out leaflets, attending the marches and swelling the ranks at rallies’, and there’s a great quote from Hannah Mitchell, who fought in the campaign while working, ‘no cause can be won between dinner and tea, and most of us who were married had to work with one hand tied behind us’. In addition to the NUWSS, the WSPU and the WFL, many other political organisations were established at the time, some with male and female members, perhaps the most intriguing of which is the Barmaids’ Political Defence League!

Given the endless duplicity of politicians, is it any wonder they turned to militancy? 1908 saw yet another betrayal when the Liberal Government blocked a bill introduced by MP Henry Stanger on women’s suffrage. This was met, understandably, with outrage and renewed determination to fight, and ultimately led to a campaign of window smashing. As militant activity increased the treatment of protestors by police intensified and forcible feeding was introduced for those suffragettes on hunger strike in prison. Although Hawksley does discuss a wide range of organisations and gives a sense of what was happening nationally, it’s a shame that Winson Green prison in Birmingham was not mentioned as one of the first sites of forcible feeding in England (Birmingham Archives & Heritage holds the prison minutes). She does, however, discuss male prisoners who were also forcibly fed – an aspect of the story that is probably unfamiliar to most people. Arguably the worst incident of police brutality occurred on November 18th 1910, ‘Black Friday’, set against the backdrop of yet another Liberal betrayal: Asquith had refused to allow the facilities for making the Conciliation Bill law, which had been introduced by pro-suffrage MPs. Here we gain a real sense of just how deplorable Herbert Asquith and Winston Churchill were – afraid of the threat these women posed, they ordered police to use violence, often sexual, and the police in turn encouraged anti-suffrage protestors who were there to join in the abuse. The reports make for extremely disturbing reading. One elderly woman, who had been assaulted by a policeman, died a few weeks later of a heart attack. The subsequent return to militancy advocated by Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst was possibly a miscalculation however – many supporters now turned against them and it led to accusations of terrorism. The humour behind many of the protests is impressive however – flags on Balmoral Golf Course in Aberdeenshire were replaced overnight with ones of suffragette colours, while after Northfield Library in Birmingham was burnt down one of Emmeline Pankhurst’s books was found left behind with a note ‘this is for your new library’. Dangerous tactics were now being employed, for example, empty properties were bombed, and the nature of the campaign had clearly changed. The fight was now seen as war and targets were no longer restricted to government.

It is especially poignant to read about Emily Wilding Davison on the 100th anniversary of her death and to realise that she was the same age that I am now. Would I have fought as hard as she did? Could I have endured repeated force feeding? It is understandable that she was claimed by the others as a martyr for the cause – the shockingly public death caught on film, her own back story, the simmering tensions and violence. (The researcher and writer Elizabeth Crawford has published a huge amount of invaluable research on the wider subject and more recently on Davison, see her blog ‘Woman and her Sphere‘). Emily’s companion that day was Mary Richardson, the subject of physical attack following the incident (she had to hide from the angry mob in Epsom train station), and Hawksley discusses the subsequent incident which brought Richardson herself into the public eye, when she slashed the National Gallery’s Rokeby Venus (subject of an earlier post in this blog, ‘Slashing the Rokeby Venus’). The idea that Richardson returned to the Gallery in the years after the vote had been won and admired the slash marks is especially fascinating.

By 1914 a huge number of militant acts had been committed but the outbreak of war in August meant a cessation of activity as Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst and the WSPU firmly backed the war effort. Fawcett, meanwhile, continued to lobby for change. In 1917 a clause for women’s suffrage was accepted into the Representation of the People Bill and the Act was passed in February 1918. Now all women aged over 30 who met the minimum property qualification could vote. The WSPU rather ungraciously claimed victory but this is hard to justify; they did not have backing of the public before war, indeed, many were against them because of their militancy, while Fawcett had quietly continued the campaign. The 1920s saw a period of rapid change for women, the discussion of expanding the franchise and increasing women’s rights, legally, socially, and sexually, was never far from the surface. (It struck me that the arguments used then against giving the vote to women aged under 30 echo those used today against allowing 16- and 17-year-olds the vote). Sadly, Emmeline Pankhurst died just a few months before the law passed while Millicent Garrett Fawcett died the following year. It is significant that the last word of Hawksley’s brilliant book is given over to Fawcett, with a quote from a speech she gave in 1913: ‘Other movements towards freedom have aimed at raising the status of a comparatively small group of class. But the women’s movement aims at nothing less than raising the status of an entire sex – half the human race – to lift it up to the freedom and valour of womanhood’.

This is a marvellous book that I would highly recommend to anyone interested in women’s history and the fight for equality and I will definitely encourage the girls I’ve worked with on Fight for the Right to read it. It gives the reader an acute appreciation of the length of time it took for change to occur and the persistent and determined campaigning that ultimately led to the militant activity, born of frustration and anger and a reaction against the endless betrayals of politicians. The tales Hawksley recounts have much relevance and resonance for women today. Yesterday an article appeared in the Guardian titled ‘What would you fight for?‘ While women may indeed now have equal voting rights, in the UK at least, the fight is most definitely not over.

Nicola Gauld

Advertisements

And action!

26 Tuesday Mar 2013

Posted by Fight for the Right in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

bertha ryland, birmingham, catherine osler, drama, equality, fawcett, feminism, film, hilda burkitt, history, kings norton girls school, militant, protest, re-enactment, suffrage, suffragettes, suffragists, vote, waverley school, women's rights, wspu

Filming Fight for the Right: the Birmingham Suffragettes has now begun in earnest. Last week we filmed two scenes at Kings Norton Girls School, including the opening scene set in a present day classroom.

Filming the opening scene
Filming the opening scene
filming Bertha Ryland

filming Bertha Ryland
Photo courtesy of Matthew Ward @historyneedsyou

police harrassment

police harrassment!
Photo courtesy of Matthew Ward @historyneedsyou

Yesterday both schools came together at Birmingham Archives & Heritage to film 6 scenes, including one of the most pivotal incidents, when the suffragettes and suffragists march together. We also filmed Hilda Burkitt and Bertha Ryland as they plan their protest for Prime Minister Asquith’s visit to Birmingham, and a scene featuring Catherine Osler, also discussing the visit of Asquith and her outrage at women being prevented from attending the meeting.

journalist, Mrs Osler & Mrs Fawcett

journalist quizzing Mrs Osler & Mrs Fawcett
Photo courtesy of Matthew Ward @historyneedsyou

Mrs Osler

Mrs Catherine Osler
Photo courtesy of Matthew Ward @historyneedsyou

the arrest of Hilda Burkitt

the arrest of Hilda Burkitt
Photo courtesy of Matthew Ward @historyneedsyou

On Thursday we will finish shooting scenes that feature Prime Ministers Asquith and Lloyd George and Mrs Osler and Mrs Fawcett. In a few weeks we will film the scenes that show Bertha Ryland planning her attack on a painting at the Art Gallery and the scenes with Hilda Burkitt in Winson Green, undergoing the ordeal of forcible feeding.

Both groups of participants have been absolutely amazing! Their positivity and enthusiasm was infectious (even when standing around in freezing cold temperatures!) and Sima Gonsai and myself have had a brilliant time working with them. The film already looks very special indeed and we can’t wait for people to see it, hopefully towards the end of June. We’d also really like to say a HUGE thanks to all of our supporters, particularly Nikki Thorpe, Don Hazzard and Richard Albutt for their amazing help and support, Matthew Ward, Ellie Dobson & Rosalind Fursland, who were brilliant extras on the shoot, staff at the Archives, the Heritage Lottery Fund and Birmingham City Council for their help with this project – we couldn’t have done it without them.

Nicola

Tabby the suffragist

Tabby the suffragist
Photo courtesy of Matthew Ward @historyneedsyou

journalist & passerby

journalist & passerby
Photo courtesy of Matthew Ward @historyneedsyou

Sima Gonsai, director

Sima Gonsai, director
Photo courtesy of Matthew Ward @historyneedsyou

Project manager Nicola

Nicola Gauld, project manager
Photo courtesy of Matthew Ward @historyneedsyou

Visit from Shabana Mahmood

14 Friday Dec 2012

Posted by Fight for the Right in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

birmingham, equality, labour party, ladywood, parliament, politics, vote

Last week we welcomed Labour MP for Birmingham Ladywood, Shabana Mahmood, to the archive. We were really pleased Shabana could come and talk to us and it was an extremely interesting session.

Shabana Mahmood, MP

Shabana Mahmood, MP

Shabana told us what it was like for her as a young Asian woman in politics today, one of only a handful currently in Parliament and also one of the first female Muslim MPs. While she has faced occasional sexism from male counterparts this has not stopped her from progressing through the party to her current position as Shadow Minister for Higher Education.

Picture6She told us that she had grown up in a politically-active family and has always been supported by her family throughout her career. We also heard how much hard work is involved in being a politician and the effect it has on social and personal life. It was really important for our group to meet such a successful female politician and to think about Shabana’s journey within the wider context of women’s rights. It was the perfect session before we visit Parliament. We only wish she could have stayed longer! Thanks Shabana!

The F word

27 Tuesday Nov 2012

Posted by Fight for the Right in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

equality, feminism, militant, protest, suffragettes, women's rights

On Friday an article appeared in the Guardian, ‘Why is ‘feminism’ such a tough badge to wear?’. Written by a young woman, Rosie Kelly, she describes how in a recent university seminar, when her lecturer asked for feminists to raise their hands, she felt unable to do so (only 1 female student out of 20 did raise their hand). Kelly then declares herself unembarrassed by what she stands for but reluctant to label herself a feminist. Many things troubled me about this article (and I would be keen to know what happened in the seminar after the question was asked), particularly the conclusion that if Caitlin Moran says it’s ok to be a feminist then it must be ok, along with the somewhat twee definition of feminists as ‘just informed women who don’t think we’re quite there yet on the equality front’.

But it was the image of WSPU founders, Annie Kenney and Christabel Pankhurst that really bothered me.

Annie Kenney & Christabel Pankhurst

As project manager for Fight for the Right, I’ve been thinking a lot about the suffragette fight and about how young women today relate to history and issues around gender and equality. The article itself did not refer to the campaign for women’s right to vote and the following comments mentioned the word ‘suffragettes’ twice, albeit in passing. There was no historical context to this article and no awareness of the progression of women’s rights since gaining the vote in 1928. In terms of campaigning today, UK Feminista, for example, has a really high profile at the moment but this is not mentioned and it really worried me that Kelly could only think of feminism within the context of Moran’s recent book, How to be a Woman. This is why I think our project, and other similar ones, have real value for young women growing up today. Being involved in this project will not only encourage students to understand the importance of exercising their right to vote, but will help make them aware of what was happening in their own city, to understand the reasons behind militant suffragette activity alongside the peaceful methods of the suffragists, to appreciate how long it can take for things to change, and to recognise that generally speaking women today still do not enjoy the same equalities as men, socially, financially and politically, not just in Britain but across the globe.

Kelly’s reasoning for not wanting to identify herself with the word ‘feminism’, because it equates to ‘man-hating, frumpy lesbians’, seems to me to be really clichéd and I think Kelly, and women who hold that same opinion, are in trouble if they can’t engage with the wider issues and the historical context of women’s rights and equality. The accusation that women who stood up for themselves were sexually-frustrated man-haters was around 100 years ago and there really is no place for it anymore. By using that as an excuse for not wanting to label themselves as feminists, the young women in this article are continuing to perpetuate that version of women. Being a feminist is not about some tabloidy, lads-mag image but so much more than that. It’s about people standing up for what they believe in and for equal rights and opportunities for people, men and women, of all backgrounds. I think if Kelly really wants to understand what it means to be a feminist, and to not be scared of the word, she needs to look much farther back than just ‘Before Caitlin’ – and find out about Pankhurst, Fawcett and the rest. And for the record, I am definitely a feminist – and proud to admit it!

Nicola Gauld

Who we are…

23 Friday Nov 2012

Posted by Fight for the Right in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

birmingham, equality, militant, protest, suffrage, suffragettes, suffragists, vote, women's rights

We’re a group of Year 10 students from Kings Norton Girls School and Year 8 students from Waverley School, both in Birmingham.

We wanted to be involved in this project:

To learn more about the past, to learn how to interpret the past for others, because we’re interested in women’s rights and in learning more about protest and direct action. We hope to inspire future generations and to give women in the past a voice today.

We want to learn more about the Suffragettes, especially the non-famous ones and ones that lived in Birmingham, to find out about different methods of protest, especially peaceful versus militant, and to find out how the activities of the Suffragettes are relevant for us today.

The activities we’re planning to do include: workshops at Birmingham Archives and Birmingham Museum & Art Gallery, to meet a local female politician, to visit the Houses of Parliament, to record stories about the suffragettes through film and to document the project to create a learning resource.

And we’ll be regularly blogging about the project so follow us here on or Twitter to keep updated!

Recent Posts

  • Film trailer
  • Screening postponed
  • special screening for schools!
  • the premiere!
  • sold out!

Archives

  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 746 other followers

Brum_Suffragettes

  • RT @UKVote100: Looking forward to #Vote100conf for Regional Suffrage Historians @janerobinson00 @vicky_ig @MuseumofLondon @womanandsphere… 2 years ago
  • RT @HLFRoutes2Roots: Inspired by the story of @SuffragetteFilm? Check out @Suffragettes12 #YoungRoots project in Brum: https://t.co/MGhLeLk… 2 years ago
  • RT @elsuffragettes: We're looking for a London BSL interpreter to work with us on Sat 9 Aug. Event info here eastlondonsuffragettes.tumblr.com/toynbeehall Email w… 3 years ago
  • Very excited to announce that we will be screening our film @PankhurstCentre in September!! Thanks @1000plateaus for organising. 3 years ago
  • RT @TeaTenacity: @Suffragettes12 Check out our new play set in 1913: suffragism,health reform & intrigue #FirstDoNoHarm on at Blue Orange T… 3 years ago
Follow @suffragettes12

Archives

  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012

archives art gallery asquith bertha ryland bingley hall birmingham catherine osler david cameron david lloyd george democracy in action drama emily wilding davison equality fawcett feminism film first world war helen pankhurst hilda burkitt history houses of parliament kings norton girls school labour party ladywood library lucinda hawksley lydia becker militant museum nellie hall nightingale norton NUWSS paintings pankhurst parliament politics prison protest punishment re-enactment rokeby venus suffrage suffragettes suffragists to freedom's cause velazquez violence vote waverley school westminster hall winson green wollstonecraft women's rights workshops wspu

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.com
Advertisements

Blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel